baiter comments on Rationality Quotes March 2012 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Thomas 03 March 2012 08:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (525)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: baiter 02 March 2012 12:52:37PM *  59 points [-]

"...I always rejoice to hear of your being still employ'd in experimental Researches into Nature, and of the Success you meet with. The rapid Progress true Science now makes, occasions my regretting sometimes that I was born so soon. It is impossible to imagine the Height to which may be carried, in a thousand years, the Power of Man over Matter. We may perhaps learn to deprive large Masses of their Gravity, and give them absolute Levity, for the sake of easy Transport. Agriculture may diminish its Labor and double its Produce; all Diseases may by sure means be prevented or cured, not excepting even that of Old Age, and our Lives lengthened at pleasure even beyond the antediluvian Standard. O that moral Science were in as fair a way of Improvement, that Men would cease to be Wolves to one another, and that human Beings would at length learn what they now improperly call Humanity!"

-- Benjamin Franklin, Letter to Joseph Priestley, 8 Feb 1780

Comment author: [deleted] 05 March 2012 09:28:37PM 10 points [-]

We've made really decent progress in only two hundred and thirty-odd years. We're ahead of schedule.

Comment author: Stabilizer 04 March 2012 05:54:09AM *  10 points [-]

One of the first transhumanists?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 05 March 2012 08:29:56AM 6 points [-]

The hard core of transhumanism goes back to at least the Middle Ages, possibly sooner.

Comment author: Stabilizer 05 March 2012 08:35:52AM 2 points [-]

Interesting. The particular philosophers you have in mind?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 05 March 2012 09:44:52AM 13 points [-]

Primarily, I had the Arabic-speaking philosophical alchemists in mind, but there are others. If there is significant interest, then I will elaborate further.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 06 March 2012 12:52:01PM *  20 points [-]

Okay, 2 comments and 3 upvotes is good enough for a quick comment but not a discussion post.

By the "hard core of transhumanism" I mean the belief that humans could use reason to obtain knowledge of the natural world that we can use in order to develop technologies that will allow us to cure sickness, eliminate the need to labor, and extend our lifespans to greater-than-human levels and that we should do these things.

During the Islamic Golden Age, many thinkers combined Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism with knowledge from indigenous craft traditions into a form of alchemy that was refined using logic and laboratory experimentation (Jābir ibn Hayyān is probably the most famous of these thinkers). These philosophers and technologists believed that their theoretical system would allow them to perform transmutation of matter (turn one element into another) unlocking the ability to create almost any "machine" or medicine imaginable. This was thought to allow them to create al ixir (elixir) of Al Khidr fame which, in principle, could extend human life indefinitely and cure any kind of disease. Also of great interest was the attainment of takwin, which is artificial, laboratory-created "life" (even including the intelligent kind). It was hoped (by some) that these artificial creations (called a homunculus by Latin speakers and analogous to the Jewish golem) could do the work of humans the way angels do Allah's work. Not only could these AIs do our work for us, they could continue our scientific enterprise. According to William Newman, these AIs or robots "...of the pseudo-Plato and Jabir traditions could not only talk - it could reveal the secrets of nature." Sound familiar?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 06 March 2012 01:36:27PM 7 points [-]

Was there any speculation about the Friendly takwin problem?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 06 March 2012 01:44:48PM *  16 points [-]

Not that I know of, but you would think they would have since they were familiar with how badly you could end up screwing yourself dealing with Jinn even though they would do exactly what you tell them to (literally). There are a great many Arabic texts that historians of science have yet to take a look at. Who knows, maybe we'll luck out and find the solution to the FAI problem in some library in Turkey.

Comment author: Strange7 07 March 2012 08:05:40AM 1 point [-]

Might also have been an attitude like a lot of people have today, along the lines of :

Let's build something that works repeatably for trivial stuff under laboratory conditions first, to see what that tells us about the fundamental capabilities and limitations. We can spec out a control mechanism resilient enough to keep working in the field once someone's actually planning a full-scale prototype.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2012 12:21:16PM 1 point [-]

Interested.

Comment author: Bugmaster 05 March 2012 10:37:41PM 1 point [-]

I'm interested as well.

Comment author: Ezekiel 05 March 2012 10:22:06PM 1 point [-]

Put me down as "interested".

Comment author: Will_Newsome 05 March 2012 09:10:21AM 1 point [-]

Does Imitation of Christ count as transhumanism, or is too ideologically distinct?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 05 March 2012 09:41:13AM 2 points [-]

I would say no, because their isn't enough emphasis on technology as the means of achieving post-humanity.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 04 March 2012 12:14:24PM *  -2 points [-]

"Be perfect, like an FAI is perfect." -- Jesus

Comment author: peter_hurford 06 March 2012 03:38:09AM *  2 points [-]

Benjamin Franklin sure knew how to use the caps. I miss the old days.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 06 March 2012 03:47:45PM 1 point [-]

The Germans of his day put him to shame.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 07 March 2012 05:13:52AM 0 points [-]

In fact they still do.