Yvain comments on Open Thread, March 1-15, 2012 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 01 March 2012 08:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (102)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Yvain 08 March 2012 06:17:34PM 4 points [-]

Seen here:

Harvard psychologist and APS Fellow and Charter Member Ellen Langer observed similar rule-based behavior in a typical office setting. She had researchers ask if they could cut in line to use a copy machine. When they simply said, “Excuse me, may I use the copy machine?”, only 60 percent of the subjects complied. When the researchers gave a reason — “Excuse me, may I use the copy machine because I’m in a rush?” — 94 percent said yes. Langer tested this one more time with the phrase, “Excuse me, may I use the copy machine because I need to make some copies,” and again 93 percent of respondents agreed — despite the fact that “I need to make some copies” is not really a very good reason for cutting in line. The way Langer and Cialdini describe it, people hear the word “because” and assume that there is a good reason. That is to say, the word “because” is a shortcut people use to distinguish between good arguments and bad. "

Comment author: Will_Newsome 08 March 2012 09:04:30PM 1 point [-]

Many results like those can be found in this book which I found very much superior to Cialdini's Influence.

Comment author: Anubhav 09 March 2012 07:40:27AM *  0 points [-]

The link doesn't seem to have anything to do with the quote.

Is this some sort of metacommentary? ("People see a link and assume there is a good source"?)

Edit: Probably meant to link here. (Google cache)