= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Spurlock comments on I Was Not Almost Wrong But I Was Almost Right: Close-Call Counterfactuals and Bias - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
So, feedback requested on the Dr. Zany thing. Made an otherwise dry post more interesting to read, or pointless and distracting?
Liked it, but thought there was a bit too much of it (e.g. the blue-minimizing robot reference). Might be better to leave out details that don't help you illustrate your point, lest the reader get a sense that your example isn't going anywhere.
Check. It was a good idea, but could've and should've been shortened. I skimmed it, and my guess is that it could've been set up in one or two paragraphs if only the minimum of required detail had been included.
I disagree that there were too many extraneous details about Dr. Zany in this post. They didn't detract from the value of the post and, at least, the blue-minimizing robot reference was funny.