infotropism comments on Maybe theism is wrong - Less Wrong

-5 Post author: infotropism 11 April 2009 04:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: infotropism 12 April 2009 07:12:36PM 0 points [-]

Is it ok to radically edit and change something that's been there for more than a day ?

Comment author: jimrandomh 12 April 2009 07:24:12PM 1 point [-]

No official guidelines have been put forth on that question. If you do edit in a way that could invalidate replies, you should put in a note to that effect. The main reason not to edit is that people who have already read the article are unlikely to see the edits, whereas they would be looking for new comments.

Comment author: infotropism 12 April 2009 09:57:28PM 0 points [-]

Then I shall note here that I made that edit, and rewrote the whole text.

Comment author: ciphergoth 13 April 2009 10:00:14AM 0 points [-]

TBH, after this long I'd make a new post.

I have to confess that I had a "tl;dr" reaction too; I wasn't hooked within the first three paragraphs or so, and I scanned for the hook after that but didn't find it.

Comment author: infotropism 13 April 2009 10:40:38AM 0 points [-]

Do you mean on the first, or on the second, edited text ? If on the second then it is probably not a good idea for me try to repost this for the moment. I should first attempt to learn how to write more compellingly.

Comment author: ciphergoth 13 April 2009 11:04:33AM 0 points [-]

Ooops, sorry, didn't realise you'd already done the rewrite.

The rewrite is a definite improvement. I still feel you haven't made your case, I'm afraid.

Comment author: infotropism 13 April 2009 11:24:27AM 0 points [-]

I feel my issue, beyond the poor writing style, is that I am making not one but two cases.

The case about theism in particular, and then a more general case about tolerance, which is linked to the theism problem, and contains it.

A good deal of what I wanted to say for the second case, as well as stuff I hadn't thought of, has been better said in the recent It's okay to be (at least a little) irrational post too.

Comment author: byrnema 16 January 2010 03:34:39PM *  0 points [-]

I think that this post still needs another rewrite. I would recommend making it shorter again, and using bullets and other organizational tools. Also, even just a full space between paragraphs would make it more readable. This is the first post that comes up, by the way, when you search 'theism'.