Anubhav comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 10 - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 07 March 2012 04:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (641)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Anubhav 13 March 2012 11:20:03AM 1 point [-]

Was the potions thing foreshadowed? Did we ever see a magical weakling brewing an advanced potion before this chapter?

Comment author: Xachariah 13 March 2012 02:13:10PM 0 points [-]

Do you mean aside from in Canon? If you are not familiar with the canon version, gur pngtvey Ryvrmre ersref gb vf Urezvbar va UC naq gur Punzore bs Frpergf.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 15 March 2012 07:07:26PM 3 points [-]

Please don't rot13 parts of books that came out in the previous century. It gets on my nerves, and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 16 March 2012 10:10:31AM 1 point [-]

I think spoilers, even for old stories, are a courtesy, especially if the parts being spoilered aren't part of common knowledge. I read King Lear as a teenager without knowing how it was going to end, and I think it was better that way.

Comment author: Blueberry 25 March 2012 10:22:17AM *  0 points [-]

Possibly relevant

Also

You do not need to rot13 anything about HP:MoR or the original Harry Potter series unless you are posting insider information from Eliezer Yudkowsky which is not supposed to be publicly available (which includes public statements by Eliezer that have been retracted).

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 March 2012 01:10:45PM 0 points [-]

Maybe I'm an outlier about spoilers. As far as I can tell, there are some stories which I very much prefer having been surprised by, and I regret having read internet discussions which explained Focus rather than having read A Deepness in the Sky cold.

Comment author: Blueberry 25 March 2012 10:59:14PM 0 points [-]

Now I'm curious: explain Focus to me? I haven't read anything Vinge wrote, so all I know about it is the one sentence from the Wikipedia page. (You can rot13 or PM me if you're worried about spoiling it for anyone else.)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 March 2012 11:36:13PM 0 points [-]

The wikipedia page is pretty much what I was going to say-- vg'f orvat noyr gb pbageby gur bowrpg bs nhgvfz-fglyr ulcresbphf, jvgu gur pbzcyrkvgl bs gur jbex orvat yvzvgrq ol gur vagryyvtrapr bs gur Sbphfrq crefba. Vg'f n irel anfgl fbeg bs fynirel, jbexrq bhg va pbafvqrenoyr qrgnvy ol Ivatr. V qba'g erzrzore gur zrpunavfz.

Comment author: Blueberry 25 March 2012 11:51:14PM 0 points [-]

I did notice the target of the wikipedia link, and I haven't read the book, but is it literally orvat noyr gb pbageby gur bowrpg bs nhgvfz-fglyr ulcresbphf? It sounds a lot stronger and weirder and deeper than that, with only a superficial similarity.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 March 2012 01:48:17AM 0 points [-]

It's been a while since I've read the book, ohg vg tbrf snegure guna nhgvfz orpnhfr Sbphfrq crbcyr trarenyyl pna'g gnxr pner bs gurzfryirf. Nyfb, lbh znl abg or vzntvavat ubj n fynir-bjavat qvpgngbefuvc jbhyq znxr hfr bs gur grpu-- be vg'f cbffvoyr V'z abg qbvat gur fhowrpg whfgvpr.

Comment author: Anubhav 13 March 2012 02:19:24PM *  0 points [-]

Do you mean aside from in Canon?

Yes.

More specifically, I meant in this fic.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 13 March 2012 06:22:43PM 0 points [-]

Nope. It's new. Well, aside from the fact that it can be logically induced the moment you see a potion's effects.

Comment author: Anubhav 14 March 2012 02:38:33AM 0 points [-]

IIRC the only potions we've seen so far have been the ones brewed by Quirrell for the Azkaban arc.

Comment author: GeorgieChaos 02 April 2012 09:30:15AM -1 points [-]

Though when Tonks is masquerading as a member of SPHEW one of the bullies does level a spell at her intended to dispel the effects of Polyjuice.