Swimmer963 comments on Rationally Irrational - Less Wrong

-11 Post author: HungryTurtle 07 March 2012 07:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (414)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Swimmer963 10 March 2012 11:13:05PM 1 point [-]

Symbols are irrational. If symbols are irrational, and humans are unable to escape symbols, then humans are fundamentally irrational.

In what sense do you mean that symbols are irrational? Is it because they only imperfectly represent the world that is "really out there?" Is there a better option for humans/hypothetical other-minds to use instead of symbols?

Comment author: HungryTurtle 06 April 2012 05:26:11PM -1 points [-]

Symbols by definition are analogies to reality. Analogies are not rationally based, they are rhetorically based. Rhetoric is by no means rational in the sense that this community uses the word. Therefore language is by definition irrational.

Is there a better option for humans/hypothetical other-minds to use instead of symbols?

No, that is my point. Humans have no other way to relate to reality. The idea of a better option is a fiction of essentialist philosophy.