Tripitaka comments on Of Gender and Rationality - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 April 2009 12:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (342)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tripitaka 21 March 2011 01:26:14PM 0 points [-]

I, too, find myself sceptical about a lot of the claims about fundamental brain-ware-differences between men/women that are often made here.I rarely see sources & credible studies linked. May I ask for reading material?

Comment author: taryneast 21 March 2011 02:59:55PM 1 point [-]

Did a quick google for it and can't dig up anything easy to reach. I'm remembering stuff from first-year psych that was basically a decade ago now.

The only keywords I recall are that it was a "visual wall experiment" that was done with crawling infants (ie mainly pre-language). I'll describe the experiment in case anybody else recognises it and can point us at better references.

I can remember watching the video, where infants were placed on a glass tabletop - underneath which was an obvious drop off, visible through the glass. ie the infants weren't in actual danger of falling - but it looked (to them) as though they might. The drop-off went down about a metre and was painted with a grid-pattern so the infant had clear visual clues of what it was.

A reward (toy? food? can't remember) was placed at the other end of the table, and the infant could go get it by crawling across the glass, over the visual drop-off.

I do not recall how many infants were in the study - but it produced a clearly distinct average gender-difference in the likelihood of whether the infant would brave the scary-looking crawl to go get it.

The take-home conclusion was that males were more likely to risk more for the reward, whereas females were less likely to do so.

Comment author: jimrandomh 21 March 2011 03:05:06PM 3 points [-]

IIRC, the keyword for that experiment is "visual cliff", not "visual wall".

Comment author: taryneast 21 March 2011 04:15:05PM 0 points [-]

Aha! thank you :)

Comment author: taryneast 21 March 2011 04:20:00PM 0 points [-]

Ok, so now that we've got the correct key-phase ("visual cliff") I see that there's heaps of research using this apparatus, and most of the studies are on development of depth-perception, or infant reactions to maternal prompting etc...

Can't seem to find anything on the study that I remember. Sorry.