Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Of Gender and Rationality - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 April 2009 12:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (342)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 April 2009 03:47:44AM 3 points [-]

One thing puzzles me about evolutionary arguments for genders being interested in different subjects: It would be an evolutionary win to be interested in things that the other gender is interested in,

You're right, this is puzzling. Has it only been true for an evolutionarily short amount of time? Is seeking members of the opposite sex who share these kinds of interests a recent cultural invention? Is the claimed preference not as strong in reality as people think?

Comment author: mattnewport 16 April 2009 04:11:03AM 16 points [-]

I would say both.

For much of our evolutionary history the idea of a consumption partner rather than a production partner would have been an unaffordable luxury. Desirable properties in a mate were primarily those that would support survival and reproduction.

I think the claimed preference is also weaker in reality than people think. This is a common theme in the seduction community. What people are actually attracted to is not necessarily what they say they are looking for - sexual attraction is not based on a conscious rational weighting of positive and negative attributes.

Comment author: taryneast 21 March 2011 02:14:20PM 0 points [-]

Really interesting link, and I'd never thought of it that way before either.

Also - extra points for being the very first comment referencing the seduction community that actually provided a net plus to the conversation (regardless of gender) ;)

Comment author: MBlume 16 April 2009 04:14:14AM 0 points [-]

Thank you for the link -- I'd never seen that distinction made before and I suspect now I'm going to see it everywhere.

Comment author: Jack 16 April 2009 04:16:33AM 3 points [-]

Yeah, I think its only been a win for a short time. Maybe, for most of history hierarchy within the genders has mattered a lot more for sexual selection. And your position in the hierarchy is usually determined by your success at gender specific roles. So if you want to be the the alpha male you need to be really good at hunting and so the best hunters win. Similarly, power in the female hierarchy was dictated by things like child rearing and social knowledge. So those that focused on that won.