RichardKennaway comments on Fallacies as weak Bayesian evidence - Less Wrong

59 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 18 March 2012 03:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: taw 14 March 2012 09:27:40AM 1 point [-]

Slippery slope arguments are often treated as fallacies, but they might not be.

Who the hell things that slippery slopes are a fallacy? You got it backwards - slippery slopes are a basic fact of life, pretending they don't exist is a fallacy.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 14 March 2012 02:42:11PM 3 points [-]

Who the hell things that slippery slopes are a fallacy?

Anyone who finds "the slippery slope fallacy" a useful soldier in their argument.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 March 2012 03:08:52PM *  2 points [-]

Anyone who finds "the slippery slope fallacy" a useful soldier in their argument.

I find that soldier far less effective and versatile than actual fallacious slippery slopes arguments! Even acausal slippery slopes!

Comment author: Eneasz 14 March 2012 03:32:00PM 3 points [-]

Careful! The slope can slip both ways!

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 14 March 2012 11:48:25PM 6 points [-]

A good rule of thumb for determining which way the slope is slipping, is to see which side is arguing for a change from the status quo.