RobertLumley comments on What if the front page… - Less Wrong

38 Post author: matt 14 March 2012 06:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 14 March 2012 09:53:40AM *  4 points [-]

There are two important groups of users: 1) first-time visitors, and 2) everyday visitors. Your suggestion improves the site for the former, but you should think about the latter too.

As a everyday visitor, I want the things important for me to be at the top of the page, so that I do not have to scroll down every time. On the other hand, the things important for me can have a small font and no graphics, because I already know what to look for. What are things important for an everyday visitor? Simply: what has changed since yesterday -- new articles, new Overcoming Bias articles, new comments, new wiki edits (not everything is important to everyone, but these are the frequent changes), and perhaps featured articles. These things are not high enough now, neither are they high enough in your proposal.

After these things (which compressed enough should still leave 2/3 of the top screen empty), there can go your brain graphics, short description of the site, and the meetup map -- things that should catch the eye of the first-time visitor.

The essence is -- think about different types of users and their needs. You did it for the new users, now think about old users too. On the title page, having to scroll down is bad. Scrolling down is OK only when reading a longer text, which must begin on the first screen, but may continue below.

Comment author: RobertLumley 14 March 2012 12:05:50PM 4 points [-]

I'm not sure how often everyday visitors navigate to lesswrong.com, as if they're typing in a webaddress. I have all/recentposts saved as a bookmark, and that's all I ever start out at.

Comment author: matt 15 March 2012 06:51:14PM *  7 points [-]

24% of traffic to the front page is new visitors; 76% is returning visitors.
Overall site traffic is 51% new visitors.

Excluding post pages, landing page traffic looks like:

lesswrong.com
Landing Pages
20120213-20120314
Landing Page Visits % New Visits
/ 60,038 23.77
/r/discussion/new/ 5,972 2.34
/promoted/ 1,992 9.69
/new/ 1,886 3.50
/r/discussion/ 1,605 5.17
/about/ 1,439 19.39
/new 1,038 12.24
/comments 995 3.92
/comments/ 761 0.92
/message/inbox/ 513 0.00
/r/discussion 492 5.49
/r/discussion/comments/ 472 1.69
/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky 371 3.77
/user/Eliezer_Yudkowsky/ 280 2.50
Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 21 March 2012 07:01:31PM 0 points [-]

So this counts traffic that visits a given page as its first only? Maybe you could explain what the technical definitions of "landing page", "visit", and "new visit" are in the context of this comment.