wedrifid comments on How would you take over Rome? - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Yvain 14 March 2012 04:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (200)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 March 2012 05:12:28PM 1 point [-]

How would you take over Rome?

Sounds dangerous. Having extreme levels of power seems to be a good way to get myself killed. Pretty soon I'd find myself telling my best mates "Et tu Justin" and suchlike!

Comment author: DanielLC 14 March 2012 11:17:55PM 2 points [-]

Unfortunately, extreme levels of power are necessary to get things done. If you're afraid of being assassinated, find a way to prevent it without giving up the power.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 March 2012 03:11:34AM 4 points [-]

Unfortunately, extreme levels of power are necessary to get things done. If you're afraid of being assassinated, find a way to prevent it without giving up the power.

Choose a more versatile form of power. Militaristic political control is absolutely necessary if your task is sweeping social change - and even then political climate asserts much more influence over what you must choose to do than your 'power' exerts on the environment. Money is a far more flexible and reliable form of power for the purpose of getting nearly everything you want to get done.