LCNS comments on DIY Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Who wants to go first? - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Dustin 14 March 2012 04:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: LCNS 16 May 2012 08:04:43PM -1 points [-]

Hi,

You are being invited to participate in a research study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania. Your participation is voluntary which means you can choose whether or not you want to participate.

The Laboratory of Cognition and Neural Stimulation at the University of Pennsylvania is involved in research using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In recent years this technology has increased in popularity, and evidence suggests that some individuals may be constructing their own stimulators for personal use. We are interested in examining the reasons behind this. Please answer the questions below, and email them to braintdcs@gmail.com to give us insight into why people make their own tDCS machines.

Questions

  1. Where did you first learn about tDCS?
  2. Have you built your own tDCS machine?
  3. Where did you get the information to build the machine?
  4. Why did you want to try brain stimulation?
  5. How long have you been using tDCS?
  6. What were your experiences with this technology?
  7. Did you ever experience any side-effects?

The research team may use information about you collected from your responses. By completing the questionnaire, you are giving your consent to participate in this study. Once you email us, your responses are not considered confidential since emails do not protect confidentiality.

Thanks,

Research Specialist Laboratory of Cognition and Neural Stimulation University of Pennsylvania

Comment author: Emile 16 May 2012 08:40:22PM 3 points [-]

I would trust this much more if the email address had the mail.med.upenn.edu domain.

Comment author: CuSithBell 16 May 2012 09:19:21PM *  7 points [-]

Or if it demonstrated a modicum of context-awareness, i.e. not posting "you are being invited" on a public forum. Or if Research Specialist had a name. Or if it got the name of the laboratory right. Or...