Will_Newsome comments on Global warming is a better test of irrationality that theism - Less Wrong

-2 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 16 March 2012 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 17 March 2012 12:25:01AM *  18 points [-]

Endorsing notions like "global warming is a better test of irrationality than theism" is a better test of irrationality than theism. More generally, engagement in vague tribal politics is a better test of irrationality than any object level belief. Liquor is quicker but meta is betta! Meta meta meta meta... MEH TAH! Sing it with me now!

Comment author: TheOtherDave 17 March 2012 12:55:17AM 3 points [-]

What about endorsing notions like "Endorsing notions like 'global warming is a better test of irrationality than theism' is a better test of irrationality than theism"?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 17 March 2012 01:04:45AM *  3 points [-]

I think it's a sign of rationality, at least in context. Angels would likely consider it insufficiently meta, but man's intellect is bounded.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 17 March 2012 03:42:01AM 4 points [-]

That is a decidedly ambitious use of the phrase "of course."

Comment author: Will_Newsome 17 March 2012 03:49:00AM 4 points [-]

Heh, fair enough, I guess I don't actually have that good a model of angels. I'll replace "of course" with "likely".