Thomas comments on Global warming is a better test of irrationality that theism - Less Wrong

-2 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 16 March 2012 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Thomas 28 April 2012 02:40:08PM 12 points [-]

a model to a regime far from where it is meant to be applied

Where it is meant to be applied? For Venus, where there is 600,000 times more CO2 than here, it is regularly applied by climatologists. This is 19 or so "doublings".

Why shouldn't we half it 20 times and expect the same law to be valid?

Or at least - in which interval it is valid and why? Where one can see the hard science behind. Not only quoted that's so - but actually. Where are the Arrhenius claim's falsifications? Supporting experiments?