timtyler comments on Muehlhauser-Goertzel Dialogue, Part 1 - Less Wrong

28 Post author: lukeprog 16 March 2012 05:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (161)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 March 2012 03:17:14PM *  1 point [-]

It's kind-of trivial - you can make goal-directed systems pursue any goal you like.

The correct reply is not to argue for impossibility - but implausibility: our machine descendants will probably contine to maximise entropy - like the current biosphere does - and not some negentropic state - like gold atoms or something.

Yes, that leaves things open for a "but there's still a chance: right?" reply. That's OK - after all, there is a small chance.