= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
orthonormal comments on Evolutionary psychology: evolving three eyed monsters - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (65)
I disagree with you, but I approve of the habit of taking an idea that won't fit in a comment and expanding it into a post.
That being said, this post isn't fleshed out enough for Main- I think it belongs in Discussion. (Alternately, you could add links and other support for all your significant assertions.)
Can you be more specific in your disagreement. Most of what I got from the original post was the suggestion to be very suspicious of humans-evolved-complicated-brain-modules type arguments. I understand if that suspicion isn't the local consensus, but what's wrong with it?
Here's the conversation this sprung from.
I guess. I did not want to focus attack on specific ideas from evolutionary psychology though. But yes I need to add more citations on how DNA affects the connections between neurons.