TobyBartels comments on How to avoid dying in a car crash - Less Wrong

75 Post author: michaelcurzi 17 March 2012 07:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (288)

Sort By: Controversial

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TobyBartels 25 March 2012 06:17:15AM 0 points [-]

But you can't ride the subway/bike/take a plane with as much flexibility as a car.

You can take a bike with more flexibility than a car; speed (and safety, as remarked elsewhere) are the problems here. (Conversely, speed is a bonus for planes.)

Comment author: kpreid 25 March 2012 10:30:55PM 0 points [-]

I suspect differing definitions of "flexibility". I would be interested to see them explicated.

Comment author: TobyBartels 25 March 2012 11:43:58PM 0 points [-]

I meant that a bike can go anywhere that a car can go, and then some. (Here in the U.S., at least, bikes are legal anywhere that cars are, except for most freeways, and even freeways must have a parallel road open to bikes before bikes can be banned from them. Similar remarks apply to walking, which is even more flexible than biking. Possibly other countries have more restrictions on bikes, but there are still plenty of places that bikes can go but cars can't.) So by flexibility, walking > biking > cars > trains > planes, with the last two reversed for long-distance travel in the U.S., and with planes moved up drastically for intercontinental travel and travel to remote regions.

Now, taking a bike on certain roads may not be safe, and it almost always will take more time, but I would count these issues separately from flexibility.