smk comments on [SEQ RERUN] To Spread Science, Keep It Secret - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MinibearRex 17 March 2012 05:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: smk 17 March 2012 05:52:03AM 6 points [-]

Not one of my favorites. I'm tempted to stick this one in a mental category called "Eliezer's BDSM Posts"--you know, the ones where he says he likes to imagine living in a world where various things are deliberately made difficult/painful/scary and everyone goes around wearing black leather vests (ok, I made up the part about the vests). Also a lot of his fun theory posts would go in this category.

Comment author: Incorrect 17 March 2012 10:09:09PM 4 points [-]

I asked my brain "would it be cool to be a technomage" and my brain said yes so sorry but after the aforementioned careful analysis I'm going to have to side with Eliezer on this one.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 March 2012 06:06:45AM *  3 points [-]

I'd prefer the BDSM stuff than this. His conspiracy ideals are dubious.

"Keep it secret" just will not work this way.

Comment author: Jello_Raptor 17 March 2012 07:50:08PM 3 points [-]

Aye, not that the general idea "hijack the various stupidities of the human mind to spread raltionality/science" is itself bad, but i think this particular implementation is dubious.

Mostly because science is something anyone can do without the support of a central authority. Having a central authority and secrecy just invites people to betray it for the quick cash that one gets from a tell all memoir. Maybe we could hijack scarcity effects by actively changing the culture. Change the message to something like "Science is really hard, and you Mr.RandomPerson can't do it. The only people who can do anything of real scientific import are geniuses". (Yes yes this idea is probably crap) Somehow make science the realm of respectable elites, while turning rationality into something more akin to common sense. (Please don't make a joke about common sense being uncommon, we've all heard it)

Comment author: wedrifid 18 March 2012 01:23:56AM 1 point [-]

Aye, not that the general idea "hijack the various stupidities of the human mind to spread raltionality/science" is itself bad, but i think this particular implementation is dubious.

Exactly. It is an inept attempt to harness a bias - it just wouldn't work in this instance.

Comment author: hairyfigment 18 March 2012 04:02:20AM 0 points [-]

Seems like MoR is working just fine, and that comes closer to the topic. He's explicitly not arguing here that we should keep science secret.

Maybe he does believe Conspiracy World should exist eventually, but this post by itself seems like extremely weak evidence. Vladimir earlier made an important distinction between the secrecy Eliezer might really practice and that of literal Eighth Level Physicists.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 March 2012 04:10:54AM 1 point [-]

Seems like MoR is working just fine

That seems to be an overt attempt at publicity... that's the opposite of secrecy.

Comment author: hairyfigment 19 March 2012 01:54:24AM 0 points [-]

Um, how recently did you read the linked post?

And no, I'm not seriously proposing that we try to reverse the last five hundred years of openness and classify all the science secret. At least, not at the moment.

...I'm telling you about this vision of an alternate Earth, so that you give science equal treatment with cults. So that you don't undervalue scientific truth when you learn it, just because it doesn't seem to be protected appropriately to its value. Imagine the robes and masks. Visualize yourself creeping into the vaults and stealing the Lost Knowledge of Newton.

(emphasis in original)

Comment author: wedrifid 19 March 2012 02:10:24AM 0 points [-]

Um, how recently did you read the linked post?

Recently enough that your earlier MoR reference seems equally as flawed now.

Comment author: hairyfigment 19 March 2012 02:57:47AM 0 points [-]

...OK, what does the last sentence of the post actually mean? (Shouldn't "I am great" be the default interpretation? ^_^)

Comment author: Dmytry 17 March 2012 09:03:52AM *  2 points [-]

Well yea, but i think he has a good point. The popularizations really got out of hand lately, dumbing things down to the point where stupid person would want to do science (and a smart won't as much as before; we try to pursue things that we have special talents at; make it look like everyone can do it, and you just decrease the incentive for those few who actually can)