DanArmak comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 11 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1174)
Harry testifies: "Voldemort did it all. He made me watch with the Imperius curse -- just like when he made me help rescue Bellatrix Black."
Harry provides details of the Bellatrix rescue that only a participant would know. His accuracy can be verified by Azkaban Security Director Amelia Bones, who just happens to be present in the Wizengamot.
Harry's knowledge of the Bellatrix rescue proves the villain who Imperiused him was really Voldemort. Who else would rescue Bellatrix?
If anyone expresses doubts about Harry's super-Patronus, Harry immediately takes the excuse to annihilate a Dementor, one of which also just happens to be present in the Wizengamot.
Harry's Occlumency lets him lie through the Veritaserum about being Imperiused and witnessing poor Hermione being framed by Voldemort. He likewise lies that "Voldemort" (not Quirrell) took him to rescue Bellatrix.
Harry explains that seeing Hermione about to be condemned to Azkaban gave him the strength to finally break free of Voldemort's Imperius curse and tell everyone the truth. (Alternately, Obliviation and a Pensieve Harry wasn't supposed to find.)
Hermione is deemed innocent. Voldemort is acknowledged back in the world and is blamed. Harry can no longer be blackmailed about Azkaban because he's admitted it.
Harry-irony points for saying right in front of Lucius: "I didn't want to help Voldemort, I was under the Imperius curse".
Author-irony points for having Harry lie to blame Voldemort for two crimes that Quirrellmort is in fact guilty of.
Harry can defeat Veritaserum (maybe), but definitely can't lie to a Legilemens - and the Wizengamot officially uses one to interrogate witnesses. Maybe they wouldn't do it on the spot, for whatever reason, but they would get to shortly, because this is very serious business. And if they saw in Harry's mind that he lied, they'd just interrogate him very thoroughly and then never listen to him speak freely.
However, it's likely that Lucius believes Harry is a perfect Occlumens, which means he would fight to block a Legilimency examination.
Suppose enough people disbelieve Lucius, or just oppose him if he's keeping his reasoning secret. Harry is the one coming forward asking to testify, so they decide to let him.
But when testifying before the Wizengamot, standard procedure is to use a Legilemens. They even used one on Hermione, and no-one thinks she's any kind of Occlumens at all. So an Occlumens would be used, and would report that Harry is lying.
There's no way Daniel_Starr's plan for Harry would work - whether they let him testify or not - unless he is a perfect Occlumens, and I don't believe that even of his dark side, it's not been sufficiently foreshadowed. (Also, Eliezer just wrote in the A/N that in text fiction, a protagonist can't just power-up and gain new abilities during a crisis, because it makes for poor storytelling; he has to solve the crisis using abilities he already has.)
I don't believe this is correct.
They only bothered to use a Legilimens on the direct request of the Chief Warlock; Veritaserum is normally considered sufficient.
Good point. It's still possible that someone will request a Legilemens if Harry testifies, so such plans are risky.
Dumbledore won't ask for a Legilimens, because he'll trust Harry.
Lucius won't, because he believes Harry is Voldemort and a perfect Occlumens.
And everybody else will follow Dumbledore and Lucius' lead on the matter.
Politicians hate taking risks and being caught out. Subordinate politicians really hate taking risks and being caught out.
Unless he's a perfect Occlumens by now.
Or rather, unless his really really dark side is. Which I find quite plausible, really.
Nah, "what use is a mysterious dark side that doesn't even give him super powers?"
Chapter 27
Which, to clarify, it turned out that it wasn't. Quirrel saw right through it.
Do you mean Mr. Bester?
It was good at pretending to be other people, he just didn't know enough to make sure that the other person was the only one that Legilimens saw when reading his mind.
I don't remember at this point which one it was, but the GGP text suggests Quirrel was in fact the one to test him then.
As for the mechanics of it - you may be right, I mostly recall that it didn't actually work.