TheAncientGeek comments on 6 Tips for Productive Arguments - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (121)
This is the Socratic method of arguing. It can also be as a Dark Side technique by choosing your questions so as to lead your counterpart into a trap - that their position is logically inconsistent, or implies that they have to bite a bullet that they don't want to admit to biting.
I've seen this "countered" by people simply refusing to talk any more, by repeating their original statement, or saying "No, that's not it" followed by something that seems incomprehensible.
Why would that be a problem in their position actually is inconsistent? People don't like having their inconsistencies exposed, but it's still a legitimate concern for a truth-seeking debate.