Swimmer963 comments on Emotional regulation Part II: research summary - Less Wrong

23 Post author: Swimmer963 19 March 2012 09:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (40)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 21 March 2012 09:08:53PM 0 points [-]

They don't necessarily correlate, even...you can have intense negative emotions, intense positive emotions, mild positive emotions, etc, anywhere along a two-dimensional continuum.

That still sounds like just one dimension to me. For two dimensions, you would need "mild very positive emotions" (contentment?) and "intense slightly negative emotions" (overpowering nostalgia?).

Social sciences and psychology are like that. It's annoying, but I just kind of ignore it.

That "Downward social comparison" Wikipedia article seemed particularly terrible.

Maybe we can apply the virtue of scholarship in a differentiated fashion depending on the field.

  • For philosophy, psychology, and anything "harder" than that: do scholarship, they frequently experiment or make rigorous arguments.

  • For sociology: spin your own theory, that's all sociologists are doing anyway and your theory doesn't have to sound impressive so you can get tenure.

Comment author: Swimmer963 21 March 2012 09:19:58PM -1 points [-]

Maybe we can apply the virtue of scholarship in a differentiated fashion depending on the field.

For philosophy, psychology, and anything "harder" than that: do scholarship, they frequently experiment or make rigorous arguments.

For sociology: spin your own theory, that's all sociologists are doing anyway and your theory doesn't have to sound impressive so you can get tenure.

Sounds like a plan!