Dmytry comments on Modest Superintelligences - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Wei_Dai 22 March 2012 12:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (88)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dmytry 22 March 2012 10:47:19AM *  3 points [-]

While the benefits are clear, it is not so clear that the project would in fact outrun the pace of progress as usual.

Cloning: It is unclear to which extent the truly exceptional ability is a result of just being lucky that the random parts of the development process resulted in right kind of circuitry. I'm not even taking of nature vs nurture. Those clones won't have same fingerprints, won't have same minor blood vessel patterns, etc etc. even if the wombs were exactly identical, as long as the thermal noise differs. See also : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691715/ - early in the process, cells create variations of a gene, so that neurons have unique IDs, and don't connect to themselves. The process, while genetic, is largely random. The clones will be bright, no doubt about it, but super geniuses, i dunno.

Comment author: CarlShulman 22 July 2012 08:27:36PM 0 points [-]

It is unclear to which extent the truly exceptional ability is a result of just being lucky that the random parts of the development process resulted in right kind of circuitry.

In twin studies this is partitioned out as "non-shared environment." In the central range it explains less variation than genetics, but more than household-level environment.