wedrifid comments on Scenario analysis: semi-general AIs - Less Wrong

1 Post author: Will_Newsome 22 March 2012 09:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 22 March 2012 12:24:02PM 0 points [-]

Or maybe we're going to go extinct real soon now, because we lack ability to reflect like this, and consequently didn't have couple thousands years to develop effective theory of mind for FAI before we make the hardware.

Having the ability to design and understand AI for a couple of thousand of years but somehow the inability to actually implement it sounds just about perfect. If only!

Comment author: Armok_GoB 23 March 2012 07:06:24PM 0 points [-]

That is one idea for hacking friendliness: "Become the AI we would make if there were no existential threats and we didn't have the hardware to implement it for a few thousand years, and flaming letters appeared on the moon saying 'thou shall focus on designing Frienly AI' "

Havn't bothered typing it out before because it falls in the reference class of trying to cheat on FAI, wich is always a bad idea, but it seemed relevant here.

Comment author: Dmytry 22 March 2012 12:27:43PM *  0 points [-]

Well, it wouldn't be AI, it'd be simply I, as in "I think therefore I am." but not stopping at this period.

edit: I mean, look at the SIAI; what do exactly they do right now which they couldn't do in ancient Greece? If we could reflect on our mind better, and if our mind is physical in nature, then the idea of thinking machine would've been readily apparent, yet the microchips would still require very, very long time.

Comment author: roystgnr 24 March 2012 02:00:13AM 0 points [-]

By this logic we'd have discovered all there is to know about math (including computer science) by Roman times at the latest.

Comment author: roystgnr 24 March 2012 10:35:05PM 2 points [-]

Would anyone downvoting me care to explain why they disagree? Look at Newton or Turing: what exactly did they do which couldn't have been done in ancient Greece, and why is there no analogous counterexample for the SIAI?

Isn't "why weren't the Greeks working on Calculus" a far less silly question than "why weren't the ancient Greeks working on AI"?