Gabriel comments on Memory in the microtubules - Less Wrong

3 Post author: RichardKennaway 23 March 2012 08:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (8)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Gabriel 24 March 2012 03:59:33AM 11 points [-]

Anyone can give an informed opinion on what this means for cryonics, if true? A common-sense guess is that it would make cryonics less likely to work as the preservation of information would depend on finer structures but the magnitude of that effect depends on just how vulnerable 'the phosphorylation state of sites on microtubule lattices' is to vitrification or freezing damage. Is there a neuroscientist in the house?

Comment author: advancedatheist 24 March 2012 07:56:22PM 4 points [-]

A common-sense guess is that it would make cryonics less likely to work

You forgot to add the key phrase, "given the way cryonics organizations currently perform their suspensions." Every time you see some assertion about cryonics' alleged unworkability, you need to add that disclaimer. Otherwise you irrationally shut off the possibility of other approaches to the problems the cryonics project attempts to solve.