APMason comments on SotW: Check Consequentialism - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 29 March 2012 01:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (311)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: APMason 29 March 2012 11:44:21PM 2 points [-]

You happen to have carved out a small portion of the Internet, a medium that aside from porn is primarily for pirates vs. ninjas debates, and declared it's for some other purpose. That doesn't mean you're allowed to be surprised when pirates vs. ninjas debates happen.

Is he allowed to be surprised when lesswrong porn happens?

Comment author: thomblake 29 March 2012 11:48:09PM 4 points [-]

I think porn itself has somehow managed to stay off Less Wrong long enough to warrant surprise.

But no, it's not warranted to believe that porn about Less Wrong does not exist. Rule 34.

Comment author: Blueberry 30 March 2012 12:18:37AM 2 points [-]

It's not porn, but did you see Yvain's drawing?

Comment author: thomblake 30 March 2012 12:23:43AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, I hadn't seen that. Though for maximal thread derailment, the image really should've appeared right in your comment.

Comment author: gwern 30 March 2012 01:32:55AM 7 points [-]

I've joked in the past about writing YudkowskyxBostrom slash fics; I swear to Bayes, if people keep annoyingly discussing LW porn, I will write it!

Comment author: thomblake 30 March 2012 01:56:37AM 0 points [-]

Corollary to Rule 35. You have to now.

Comment author: thomblake 30 March 2012 02:13:40AM 0 points [-]

I'd write it, but I'm too busy working on that fic where Harry has to marry Draco to save someone from Azkaban.

Comment author: MixedNuts 30 March 2012 11:27:36AM 5 points [-]

Please include a threesome with Vassar.

Comment author: Multiheaded 02 April 2012 10:10:12AM 1 point [-]

Pass the brain bleach.