wedrifid comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! - Less Wrong

48 Post author: MBlume 16 April 2009 09:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1953)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 27 December 2011 09:50:29PM 7 points [-]

My experience of LW is that:
* the baseline interaction mode would be considered rude-but-not-insulting by most American subcultures, especially neurotypical ones
* the interaction mode invoked by "Crocker's rules" would be considered insulting by most American subcultures, especially neurotypical ones
* there's considerable heterogeneity in terms of what's considered unacceptably rude
* there's a tentative consensus that dealing with occasional unacceptable rudeness is preferable to the consequences of disallowing occasional unacceptable rudeness, and
* the community pushes back on perceived attempts to enforce politeness far more strongly than it pushes back on perceived rudeness.

Dunno if any of that answers your questions.

I would also say that nobody here has come even remotely close to "insult in every conceivable way" as an operating mode.

Comment author: wedrifid 27 December 2011 10:22:56PM *  1 point [-]

I would also say that nobody here has come even remotely close to "insult in every conceivable way" as an operating mode.

Although I must admit I was tempted take it up as a novel challenge just to demonstrate how absurd the hyperbole was.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 02 January 2012 01:28:41AM 0 points [-]

Returning to this... if you're still tempted, I'd love to see your take on it. Feel free to use me as a target if that helps your creativity, though I'm highly unlikely to take anything you say in this mode seriously. (That said, using a hypothetical third party would likely be emotionally easier.)

Unrelatedly: were you the person who had the script that sorts and display's all of a user's comments? I've changed computers since being handed that pointer and seem to have misplaced the pointer.

Comment author: gwern 02 January 2012 01:31:26AM 1 point [-]

No, that'd be Wei Dai, I think; eg. I recently used http://www.ibiblio.org/weidai/lesswrong_user.php?u=Eliezer_Yudkowsky to point out that Eliezer has more than one negative comment (contra the cult leader accusation).

Comment author: TheOtherDave 02 January 2012 01:35:11AM 0 points [-]

Hah! Awesome. Thank you!