handoflixue comments on Brain Preservation - Less Wrong

22 Post author: jkaufman 28 March 2012 12:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 28 March 2012 03:59:40PM *  12 points [-]

"Hundreds of years off" is a common estimation people give for technologies that seem really complicated and hard to make with our present knowledge. I've always found this fairly ridiculous; it's pretty much unprecedented in human history. When have we ever conceived of a specific technology, which we had any understanding of the workings behind, and taken hundreds of years to make it? The only cases I'm aware of that any sort of technology has been in-development for that long are if you count things like heavier-than-air flight, where we spent hundreds of years not applying the scientific method to understanding the problem and just threw up solutions willy nilly.

Comment author: handoflixue 29 March 2012 07:58:13PM 2 points [-]

I'd also mention Fermat's Last Theorum as a very specific example, since it took over 300 years to prove. It's rare, but it's certainly been known to happen.

Comment author: Desrtopa 29 March 2012 11:33:02PM 1 point [-]

I wouldn't call Fermat's Last Theorem a technology though.