Of course, you're not going to personally suppress them, but -- nudge nudge, wink wink -- they'd better take care if they know what's good for them, eh?

I'm not nudging, I'm not winking, and I'm not jocular or joyous: I'm dead serious, and state this as a matter of fact. Not as a threat or a warning, but as a statement of common sense. In fact, I like it better when they do not show this much common sense, so we can discuss their ideas in the open, and expose them for what they are.

You just compared being against your favoured constellation of political ideas to child molesting, and called those who are against them dangerous, repulsive, and immoral.

I chose paedophilia (not child molesting, I never said anything about actually having ever laid a hand on an actual child) because it's something people get panicky about on a gut level, but is contingent to the local region of space and time one occupies. You may replace it with "racism", "military expansionism/imperialism", "support for the Death Penalty", "support for banning guns", "support for Cryonics and/or Transhumanism", or "support for gay marriage", depending on the social environment you're moving in.

BTW, have you come across Mencius Moldbug?

I have. I am fairly unimpressed. Some interesting, daring, and refreshing new ideas, but I don't know if it's "rehearsing arguments", "one argument against a thousand", and so on and so forth, but I find his arguments un-satisfactory, ultimately.

The manifest destiny of the Aryan race? Missionary Christianity? The white man's burden of ruling the lesser peoples? Pan-Islamism?

I find it telling that you conflate all of these and put them on the same level. In particular, you seem to be confused as to what missionary Christianity and Pan-islamism entail, respectively, by themselves.