NancyLebovitz comments on SotW: Be Specific - Less Wrong

37 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 03 April 2012 06:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (306)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 07 April 2012 08:54:27AM 1 point [-]

Given our present teaching technology, this skill seems transmissible from master to apprentice, but not yet replicable by exercises.

Transmission may be a lot of how specificity has to be taught, since it's about comparing what's in your mind that you're trying to communicate to what's actually being received by someone else's mind, and the lesson is clearer if it's something you actually want to communicate-- that is, not an exercise.

Comment author: Benquo 08 April 2012 04:08:57PM 1 point [-]

Computer programming has lots of replicable tasks, and with any kind of meaningful feedback it's quite good at "be precise," which is the abstract version of "be specific."

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 08 April 2012 04:44:36PM 0 points [-]

That doesn't seem like the kind of precision most people have trouble with, though teaching it explicitly might help people who have trouble getting started on programming.

Do you think knowing how to program helps people be sufficiently explicit about other subjects?

Comment author: Benquo 08 April 2012 08:49:53PM 0 points [-]

Probably not, because of compartmentalization.

I wonder, though, if there is some sort of similar activity that:

  • Doesn't require expert instructors (some feedback is obvious or automatic)
  • Deals with less mathematical and more "real world" problems
  • Builds skills that transfer well to other domains.
Comment author: handoflixue 09 April 2012 07:51:37PM 0 points [-]

I wonder, though, if there is some sort of similar activity

Management, which is at times remarkably similar to the "malicious idiot" game...