RobinZ comments on Rationality Quotes April 2012 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 03 April 2012 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (858)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobinZ 16 April 2012 05:16:56PM 3 points [-]

The existence of factors which could adjust the score either up or down does not indicate which factors dominate. In this case, you have no information which suggests that 39700 is either above or below the median, and therefore these two cases must be assigned equal probability - canceling out any "regression to the mean" effects you could have predicted. Similar arguments apply to other effects which change the score.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 17 April 2012 05:19:36AM 2 points [-]

In this case, you have no information which suggests that 39700 is either above or below the median, and therefore these two cases must be assigned equal probability

Not quite, you have some background information about the range of scores video games usually employ.

Comment author: RobinZ 17 April 2012 05:54:10AM 1 point [-]

And, I suppose, information about the probability of people mentioning average scores. I concede that either factor could justify arguing that the score should decrease.

Comment author: maia 16 April 2012 06:55:52PM 2 points [-]

So you estimate "regression to the mean" effects as zero, and base your estimate on any other effects you know about and how strong you think they are. That makes sense. Thanks for the correction!