pedanterrific comments on Evidence for the orthogonality thesis - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 03 April 2012 10:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (289)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gRR 03 April 2012 10:57:58PM -1 points [-]

I defy the data.

Comment author: pedanterrific 03 April 2012 11:06:06PM 1 point [-]

Okay! Let's get a third opinion in here. For those just joining us, the claim (paraphrased) is

"Normal" people probably wouldn't torture 'sufficiently real' characters, not for any money.

Anyone want to chime in on this?

Comment author: Khoth 03 April 2012 11:58:35PM 6 points [-]

I'm not sure how much money it would take, but I think most normal people would do it for free if it was socially expected.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 04 April 2012 12:19:46AM 4 points [-]

Sure, I'll weigh in, since you're asking.
History, including recent history, is full of people who tortured other people.
I see no reason to believe that defining all of those people as "not normal" is in the least bit justified; that seems more likely to be a No True Scotsman fallacy in action.
Adding a concrete incentive like money probably helps, if it's a large enough sum, but honestly introducing money to the discussion seems to clutter the question unnecessarily. Normal people will torture one another for no money at all, under the right circumstances.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 04 April 2012 04:52:41AM 3 points [-]

In fact due to the way taboo tradeoffs work, I suspect offering people money will make them less inclined to torture.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 04 April 2012 01:10:51PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, that thought had crossed my mind as well; it's certainly true for small-to-medium amounts of money.

Comment author: gRR 03 April 2012 11:10:56PM -2 points [-]

Additional opinions wouldn't help. I think your belief that you would torture people for a billion dollars is wrong.

Comment author: pedanterrific 03 April 2012 11:15:28PM *  3 points [-]

This is an astonishing thing to say. You're so confident I'm wrong that if someone else stated a similar opinion you would insist they were wrong too? What if that person had a verifiable job history as a professional torturer for some third-world dictator? There comes a point where the replications outweigh your ability to judge others' knowledge of their own minds.

Comment author: gRR 03 April 2012 11:26:45PM -1 points [-]

But we're talking about 'normal' people, not professional torturers. I am fairly confident the LW community is torturers-free, DUST SPECKS controversy notwithstanding :)

My hypothesis is that you are making a logical declarative statement, not actually imagining the process.

But I guess if you insist that you are, and if many people agree with you, I will have to update...

Comment author: pedanterrific 04 April 2012 12:41:19AM 3 points [-]

But we're talking about 'normal' people, not professional torturers

What's the distinction you're making here? Do you think all professional torturers are evil mutants, or what?

My hypothesis is that you are making a logical declarative statement, not actually imagining the process.

I took this possibility seriously, so I just spent a minute imagining the process in as much detail as possible.

I'm willing to come down to a hundred million.

Comment author: gRR 04 April 2012 01:04:04AM 0 points [-]

Do you think all professional torturers are evil mutants, or what?

I don't know. I never saw one in my life.

I took this possibility seriously, so I just spent a minute imagining the process in as much detail as possible. I'm willing to come down to a hundred million.

Hmm. Ok, another hypothesis: do you use an argument like "I'll use the money I'll get to improve the conditions of lots of other people, stop many other tortures going all over the world", or something similar?
It didn't work for me, but it may make sense for a stronger rationalist.