Argency comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 14, chapter 82 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: FAWS 04 April 2012 02:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (790)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 April 2012 02:24:34AM -2 points [-]

Did I really just get down-voted for my taste in literature? I'm sure it's a very nice book and that you enjoyed it very much, Mr Down-voter, but I don't see how there's anything objectionable about it not appealing to me. I've been told before that I spend /too much/ time reading the classics so don't worry that my intellectual growth has suffered. I prefer Huxley to Orwell, although the former seems to have been a little touched, judging from his correspondences.

I know I'm new to the forum and all that, but I feel like that shouldn't be what the voting system is for. Surely in most circumstances up- and down- votes would be better used to indicate how /rational/ you think a post is, not how close to your own opinion it is. People's karma score shouldn't suffer just because their opinions differ from the majority. Anyway, regardless of what the actual forum guidelines are you'll only see me disliking arguments that display poor logic. On that note, consider that down-vote down-voted.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 April 2012 03:40:38AM 3 points [-]

Downvoted the grandparent comment just now for pointlessness (I wasn't the original offender). It adds nothing to the discussion, and I generally downvote comments that I'd rather didn't exist.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 April 2012 04:19:36AM 5 points [-]

I retract my criticism, I hadn't considered that utility.