pjeby comments on Instrumental Rationality is a Chimera - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (31)
I apologise, but is there some simpler way for you to express this? I do not understand what it means. If you stated it in terms of real-life thoughts, actions and problems I might grasp it better.
Again, is there some simpler way to express this? Who generated the procedures? Was it me or someone else? How are the procedures defined by the testing criteria? Surely a procedure is a sequence of steps toward some goal, and does not have a definition.
I remain hopelessly unenlightened.
Logical fallacies, bayes theorem, working knowledge of the scientific method and knowledge of heuristics and biases.
mattnewport has already answered the rest, so I'll just fill in this bit. What I said was:
Meaning, "the procedures you use" (e.g. for toast-buttering) "will be defined" (i.e., determined, circumscribed, narrowed, filtered, specified) "by testing" (to determine suitability) "according to some predefined criteria" (i.e., your criteria for what a successful result would consist of) "after being generated" (i.e., first you generate procedures, then you test them), "through creative and/or problem-solving processes" (i.e., either you generate improvements on, alternatives to, or solutions for problems in an existing procedure, borrow a procedure from someone else, or attempt to invent or derive one from scratch.)