chaosmosis comments on Newcomblike problem: Counterfactual Informant - Less Wrong

0 Post author: Clippy 12 April 2012 08:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: chaosmosis 13 April 2012 04:51:53PM *  0 points [-]

I think it's because it's so transparent that there's not really a problem here. This is framed so that it's obviously a good idea to give Clippy what he wants (yes I'm projecting gender onto the paperclip machine, shush).

In the more traditional setups it makes it explicitly clear that you can lie to Paul Ekman. But laws are harder to break than promises.

As far as the real world important implication goes: does this have something to do with the US healthcare bill?