nyan_sandwich comments on Our Phyg Is Not Exclusive Enough - Less Wrong

25 [deleted] 14 April 2012 09:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (513)
Tags: meta

Comments (513)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 April 2012 10:30:00PM 3 points [-]

Your edit updated me in favour of me being confused about this exception-rule business. Can you link me to something?

Comment author: Grognor 14 April 2012 10:32:22PM *  5 points [-]

"The exception [that] proves the rule" is a frequently confused English idiom. The original meaning of this idiom is that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes that a general rule existed.

-Wikipedia (!!!)

(I should just avoid this phrase from now on, if it's going to cause communication problems.)

Comment author: komponisto 16 April 2012 02:36:43AM *  2 points [-]

I suspect the main cause of misunderstanding (and subsequent misuse) is omission of the relative pronoun "that". The phrase should always be "[that is] the exception that proves the rule", never "the exception proves the rule".

Comment author: thomblake 16 April 2012 08:42:35PM 1 point [-]

Probably even better to just include "in cases not so excepted" at the end.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit