my default position is to write up the aforementioned exegesis in Latin

OK, so now you're just taking the piss.

Writing it in Latin selects to some extent for people who respect your opinions, but more strongly for people who happen to know quite a lot of Latin. It sounds as if what you actually want is to be able to say you've written up your position, without anyone actually reading it. I hope that isn't really what you actually want.

(I'm pretty stupid; apologies for any mistakes I make.)

you've stated that you don't think it's generally useful to proselytize about your intuitions before you have solid formally justified results that resulted from your intuitions

I will generally explain my intuitions but try not to waste too much time arguing for them if other people do not agree. So I think if you have any ideas that you have not already clearly explained, then you should do so. (And please, not in Latin.)

Speaking of which, do you have any ideas about a better name than "FAI"?

How about Minimally Wrong AI? :)

The reason I've made references to theology is actually a matter of epistemology, not decision theory: I think LessWrong and others' contempt for theology and other kinds of academic philosophy is unjustified and epistemically poisonous.

Making off-hand references to theology is not going to change our minds about this. Do you have an actual plan to do so? If not, you're just wasting your credibility and make it less likely for us to take your other ideas seriously.

Apologies in advance for the emotivist interpretation of morality espoused by this comment.

because I've been planning on writing a long exegesis explaining my ideas about decision theory and theology,

Yay!

but you've stated that you don't think it's generally useful to proselytize about your intuitions before you have solid formally justified results that resulted from your intuitions.

Boo.

I think LessWrong and others' contempt for theology and other kinds of academic philosophy is unjustified and epistemically poisonous. (Needless to say, I am extremely skeptical of arguments along the lines of "we only have so much time, we can't check out every crackpot thesis that comes our way": in my experience such arguments are always, without exception the result of motivated cognition.)

YAAAAAY!

Anyway, my default position is to write up the aforementioned exegesis in Latin; that way only people that already give my opinions a substantial amount of weight will bother to read it, and I won't be seen as unfairly proselytizing about my own justifiably-ignorable ideas.

Boo.