Will_Newsome comments on Intelligence Explosion vs. Co-operative Explosion - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 16 April 2012 11:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 17 April 2012 03:26:15PM 0 points [-]

(Side note: another thing that confuses me is that intelligence doesn't seem to me to be overwhelmingly correlated with spelling ability. Not quite sure what to make of this; thus far I've attributed it to unrelated selection effects on who I've encountered. Would be interested in others' impressions.)

Comment author: Hul-Gil 19 April 2012 05:25:58AM *  1 point [-]

I have found entirely the opposite; it's very strongly correlated with spelling ability - or so it seems from my necessarily few observations, of course. I know some excellent mathematicians who write very stilted prose, and a few make more grammatical errors than I'd have expected, but they can all at least spell well.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 17 April 2012 06:51:27PM 1 point [-]

I know many very intelligent good spellers, and several very intelligent mediocre spellers, and one or two very intelligent apparently incorrigibly atrocious spellers. I don't know any moderate-intelligence good spellers, a few moderate-intelligence atrocious spellers, and quite a few quite a few moderate-intelligence mediocre spellers. I don't know very many dumb people socially, and mostly don't know how good their spelling is as they don't write much. People I met on the Internet don't really count, as I filter too much on spelling ability to begin with.

Comment author: thomblake 17 April 2012 06:32:01PM 1 point [-]

I have the opposite impression, but now that I have that correlation it's hard to make further unbiased observations.