= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Eugine_Nier comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 16, chapter 85 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1106)
Even though Harry doesn't have magical-love-protection, I think we should take note of the fact that it's probably still in play and fairly broken.
If Quirrell could get Bellatrix to take a deadly spell from for him, he'd have Love's permanent protection against Dumbledore(if that were the caster). And, with the right amount of cleverness, he could probably arrange for her death to protect all death-eaters in the same way Harry provided protection to all of Hogwarts.
Frankly I wouldn't put it past Dumbledore to arrange for something similiar, for the greater good.
The way cannon magic seems to work, love-potion based love probably doesn't count as Real Love for purposes of protection.
Edit: In fact the quote at the top of the Potter wiki article on love potions says:
Bella isn't under the influence of a love potion, though.
Oops, I misread what you wrote.
She is however under the influence of equivalently dark arts.
I cannot help but find that quote hilarious.