Why would you choose steal here, if you actually believed he had precommitted to it? There's a decent enough chance he would honor his word. I doubt you would gain much, if anything, from appearing spiteful on TV.
I'd gain all of the money for a start. You are not going to have much luck convincing me that 'steal' is irrational here given that it has better overall strategic properties (than this guys ploy) and happens to be the winning move in this case.
I doubt you would gain much, if anything, from appearing spiteful on TV.
Choosing 'steal' vs 'steal' doesn't seem particularly spiteful to me.
I found this to be a very interesting method of dealing with a modified Prisoner's Dilemma. In this situation, if both players cooperate they split a cash prize, but if one defects he gets the entire prize. The difference from the normal prisoner's dilemma is that if both defect, neither gets anything, so a player gains nothing by defecting if he knows his opponent will defect; he merely has the option to hurt him out of spite. Watch and see how one player deals with this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0qjK3TWZE8