brilee comments on Hofstadter's Superrationality - Less Wrong

41 Post author: gwern 21 April 2012 01:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: brilee 22 April 2012 01:26:41AM 5 points [-]

Huh. I finally understand the "logic" that has been espoused in HPMoR, ch 33 ""Precisely," said Harry Potter, his face now turning serious. "We are faced with a true Prisoner's Dilemma..."

What this reminds me of is the logistic equation: dx/dt = x(1-x).

This simple system has two equilibrium points: x = 0, and x = 1. x=0 is unstable - that is, any perturbation will cause the system to veer away from that equilibrium point. x=1 is stable, and any perturbations return to that equilbrium.

Hofstadter says that superrationalists should decide to pick the x=0 (unstable) equilibrium - i.e., cooperate. But any deviation from superrationality, however slight, will cause the equilibrium to collapse into the all-defect equilibrium.

Comment author: gwern 22 April 2012 02:25:21AM 5 points [-]

"Reverbrating doubt", I believe Hofstadter's term is.

Comment author: Nisan 22 April 2012 08:34:33AM 3 points [-]

I feel like that's not the way it should work in a worked-out theory. Maybe I or someone else will write a post about this someday.