timtyler comments on Muehlhauser-Wang Dialogue - Less Wrong

24 Post author: lukeprog 22 April 2012 10:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (284)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: timtyler 23 April 2012 01:24:40AM *  5 points [-]

If intelligence turns out to be adaptive (as believed by me and many others), then a “friendly AI” will be mainly the result of proper education, not proper design. There will be no way to design a “safe AI”, just like there is no way to require parents to only give birth to “safe baby” who will never become a criminal.

I don't think that follows. What consumer robot makers will want will be the equivalent of a "safe baby" - who will practically never become a criminal. That will require a tamper-proof brain, and many other safety features. Robot builders won't want to see their robots implicated in crimes. There's no law that says this is impossible, and that's because it is possible.

Machines don't really distinguish between the results of education and apriori knowledge. That's because you can clone adult minds - which effectively blurs the distinction.

Comment author: shminux 23 April 2012 03:49:43AM 1 point [-]

That's because you can clone adult minds - which effectively blurs the distinction.

Clone? Maybe. Hopefully. Create from scratch? Not so sure.

Comment author: timtyler 23 April 2012 10:42:20AM *  2 points [-]

Clone? Maybe. Hopefully. Create from scratch? Not so sure.

I meant that you can clone adult machine minds there.