John_Maxwell_IV comments on Muehlhauser-Wang Dialogue - Less Wrong

24 Post author: lukeprog 22 April 2012 10:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (284)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Grognor 23 April 2012 03:49:33PM *  7 points [-]

Think about how ridiculous your comment must sound to them.

I have no reason to suspect that other people's use of the absurdity heuristic should cause me to reevaluate every argument I've ever seen.

That a de novo AGI will be nothing like a human child in terms of how to make it safe is an antiprediction in that it would take a tremendous amount of evidence to suggest otherwise, and yet Wang just assumes this without having any evidence at all. I can only conclude that the surface analogy is the entire content of the claim.

That you just assume that they must be stupid

If he were just stupid, I'd have no right to be indignant at his basic mistake. He is clearly an intelligent person.

They have probably thought about everything you know long before you and dismissed it.

You are not making any sense. Think about how ridiculous your comment must sound to me.

(I'm starting to hate that you've become a fixture here.)

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 24 April 2012 04:46:43AM -1 points [-]

If he were just stupid, I'd have no right to be indignant at his basic mistake.

This is off-topic, but this sentence means nothing to me as a person with a consequentialist morality.

Comment author: Grognor 24 April 2012 01:27:15PM *  2 points [-]

The consequentialist argument is as follows:

Lowering the status of people who make basic mistakes causes them to be less likely to make those mistakes. However, you can't demand that non-intelligent people don't make basic mistakes, as they are going to make them anyway. So demand that smart people do better and maybe they will.

The reasoning is the same as Sark Julian's here/here.

I guess the word "right" threw you off. I am a consequentialist.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 24 April 2012 06:06:48PM 0 points [-]

I'd guess that such status lowering mainly benefits in communicating desired social norms to bystanders. I'm not sure we can expect those whose status is lowered to accept the social norm, or at least not right away.

In general, I'm very uncertain about the best way to persuade people that they could stand to shape up.