shminux comments on [SEQ RERUN] Bell's Theorem: No EPR "Reality" - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (19)
I assume that this is your personal model, given the lack of references. Feel free to flesh it out so that it makes new quantifiable testable predictions.
My personal crackpot index counter clicks like mad after reading this.
You did not even remotely understand this comment. The whole point of what is written here is that there are infinite "Not even wrong" theories that conform to all current observations. The conventional interpretation of the Bell experiments is one of the less useful ones, because it is convoluted and has a larger computational complexity than necessary.