= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
kalla724 comments on Crowdsourcing the availability heuristic - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (40)
Whatever the merits of this post (and I'm willing to admit they may be considerable), the usage in the title doesn't make sense to me:
So you're using Google -- effectively the collective brain of the entire planet -- while she's talking to a few people she knows....and she's the one who's engaged in "crowdsourcing"??
I grant you that her approach may be the better one, but do you really think "crowdsourcing" is the appropriate term for this contrast?
I see your point, but I'll argue that yes, crowdsourcing is the appropriate term.
Google may be the collective brain of the entire planet, but it will give you only those results you search for. The entire idea here is that you utilize things you can't possibly think of yourself - which includes "which terms should I put into the Google search."
In real life, you can only ask the people who you're already friends with. That means you'll probably share common biases.
Unless you asked strangers. That might be a good way to fix this.
Yes. The art of Googling can be pretty difficult, and a few brains are still smarter (though less broadly knowledgeable, perhaps) than Google, at this point in time.