jmmcd comments on Do people think Less Wrong rationality is parochial? - Less Wrong

27 Post author: lukeprog 28 April 2012 04:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (196)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jmmcd 30 April 2012 09:45:16AM 1 point [-]

I was interesting in probing the examples (just who isn't reading, generalized: LessWrong or?, etc - common).

Welp, that was impossible to parse.

Comment author: fourlier 30 April 2012 03:22:27PM 1 point [-]

Something dumb people say an awful lot: If only you read blank, you'd agree with me.

It's also something LessWrongians say a lot. Even the better breed of cat hereabouts has this tendency. The top post is something of an example, without the usual implied normative: If only other people read LessWrong more closely, they'd realize it's mainstream (in parts). Luke, kindly, places the onus on himself, doubtless as an act of (instrumentally rational) noblesse oblige.

That's background. I feel it is background most LessWrongians are somewhat aware of. I feel Luke's attitude in the top post (placing the onus on himself) is an extension of the principle that lightly or easily telling people to read the sequences is dopey.

So, now to the converation.

Romeo: People are idiots. Me: You're an idiot. Romeo: You can't read. Me: Just who isn't reading, you or me? Or more generally, LessWrong or the rest of the world? Seems like a common problem.

I enjoyed casting myself in the part of "the rest of the world".