shminux comments on [SEQ RERUN] Decoherence is Falsifiable and Testable - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Loading…
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (12)
It doesn't, except in the minds of confused people assigning ontological significance to a calculational prescription. No interpretation out there has more predictive power than "1. Do unitary evolution, 2. Apply Born rule".
If you only consider it a calculational prescription and not an ontologically real thing, then you've totally just accepted MWI!
Not sure what you mean. Please feel free to elaborate on that.