You're saying that technology - tinkering with human biology and human psychology - can supply a technical fix for problems with sex and death. But the imperfection and dysfunction of social and cultural solutions will also extend to technological solutions. Some methods of life extension will be lethal. Some hopes will be deluded. Some scientific analyses of psychology will be wrong, but they will supply the basis of a subculture or a technological intervention anyway.
Rather than discuss it on a meta level first - whatever that means - it would be better if you supplied one or two concrete examples of what you have in mind.
Rather than discuss it on a meta level first - whatever that means
It means that we should not just start discussing whether e.g. polyamory is good, but instead discuss how we, in practice, think and make value judgments about such things - without dwelling too much on concrete examples.
You're saying that technology - tinkering with human biology and human psychology - can supply a technical fix for problems with sex and death.
I hope that it will, but it might well not, or the cure might be as bad as the disease. That's an useful thought in our curre...
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.