kalla724 comments on Rationality Quotes May 2012 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 01 May 2012 11:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (696)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: kalla724 02 May 2012 01:35:54AM *  9 points [-]

The possession of knowledge does not kill the sense of wonder and mystery. There is always more mystery.

-- Anais Nin

Comment author: MixedNuts 02 May 2012 04:28:18PM 5 points [-]

This misses the point. There shouldn't be any mystery left. And that'll be okay.

Comment author: DanArmak 02 May 2012 04:35:20PM 10 points [-]

With perfect knowledge there would be no mystery left about the real world. But that is not what "sense of wonder and mystery" refers to. It describes an emotion, not a state of knowledge. There's no reason for it to die.

Comment author: bmschech 10 May 2012 03:57:46PM 0 points [-]

Nicely said. I'd like to add that perfect knowledge can only be of the knowable. The non-knowable is irreducibly wondrous and mysterious. The ultimate mystery, why there is something rather than nothing, seems unknowable.

Comment author: DanArmak 11 May 2012 04:32:41PM *  1 point [-]

There's plenty of inherently unknowable things around. For instance, almost all real numbers are uncomputable and even undefinable in any given formal language.

Comment author: chaosmosis 02 May 2012 04:39:22PM *  9 points [-]

You can't stop looking for flaws even after you've found all of them, otherwise you might miss one.

Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unexpected_hanging_paradox

Comment author: bmschech 10 May 2012 04:09:15PM 0 points [-]

Not sure why you brought this up, but as long as you did, I'd like to share my resolution of this paradox. Basically, it hinges on the definition of a surprise. If the prisoner is spared on Wednesday, he will know that he is doomed on Thursday or Friday, but is ignorant of which of these possibilities is true. So when Thursday dawns, whatever outcome obtains will be surprising. To say we are surprised by an event is simply to say that we cannot predict it in advance. Therefore, you can only reason about surprise looking forward in time, not backward. Or look at it this way. What if the judge told the prisoner that he was going to draw a slip of paper from a hat contain five slips, labeled Monday thru Friday and execute him on that day. Whatever day is chosen will be a surprise to both judge and prisoner.