I agree and have for some time, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. Especially this is I think terribly important:

Even though his prescription may be lacking (here is some criticism to neocameralism [] his description and diagnosis of everything wrong with the world is largely correct. Any possble political solution must begin from Moldbug's diagnosis of all the bad things that come with having Universalism as the most dominant ideology/religion the world has ever experienced.

But currently there is nothing remotely approaching an actionable political plan, so I advocated doing what little good one can despite Cryptocalvinism's iron grasp on the minds of a large fraction of mankind. As Moldbug says Universalism has no consistent relation to reality. A truly horrifying description of reality if it is accurate, since existential risk reduction eventually will become entangled with some ideologically charged issue or taboo.

I wish I could be hopeful but my best estimate is that humanity is facing a no win scenario here.