timtyler comments on Muehlhauser-Goertzel Dialogue, Part 2 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: lukeprog 05 May 2012 12:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: timtyler 05 May 2012 12:57:05AM *  1 point [-]

Ben: What this suggests to me is that, while my intuitions regarding OpenCog seem to be sufficient to motivate others to help me to build OpenCog (via making them interested enough in it that they develop their own intuitions about it), your intuitions regarding the dangers of AGI are not going to be sufficient to get work on AGI systems like OpenCog stopped. To halt AGI development, if you wanted to (and you haven't said that you do, I realize), you'd either need to fan hysteria very successfully, or come up with much stronger logical arguments, ones that match the force of your intuition on the subject.

I don't think that's how FUD marketing works. The idea is normally not to get the competitor's products banned, but rather to divert mindshare away from them.